Logo
Home
>
Green Investing
>
Track companies' climate reporting in line with GRI and TCFD

Track companies' climate reporting in line with GRI and TCFD

09/26/2025
Robert Ruan
Track companies' climate reporting in line with GRI and TCFD

In an age defined by environmental urgency, companies are under unprecedented pressure to disclose their climate-related impacts. Stakeholders demand not just raw data, but transparent, science-based disclosures that guide investment, policy, and community action. By aligning with GRI and TCFD standards, organizations can foster trust, mitigate risk, and demonstrate genuine commitment to a sustainable future.

Understanding Climate-related Disclosures and Their Importance

Climate-related disclosure refers to the systematic reporting of a company’s greenhouse gas emissions, energy usage, transition strategies, and associated financial risks. As global temperatures rise, investors, regulators, and communities seek clarity on how businesses face physical and transition risks.

Transparent reporting is no longer optional. A remarkable increase in stakeholder demands has emerged, urging companies to look beyond simple emissions metrics. They now require forward-looking, scenario-based analyses that reveal resilience and adaptability under various climate futures.

The Frameworks: GRI and TCFD Explained

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) represent two pillars of modern climate reporting. Each serves unique audiences and purposes, yet both share the goal of standardized transparency.

GRI is the world’s leading sustainability reporting standard, covering a broad spectrum of ESG topics. Its newly updated Climate Change and Energy Standards (GRI 102 and 103, June 2025) include requirements on just transition and vulnerable communities, use of carbon credits, and alignment with scientific evidence.

TCFD, on the other hand, was developed by the Financial Stability Board to spotlight the financial implications of climate risks and opportunities. It emphasizes four core pillars—governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics/targets—mapped across eleven detailed disclosures.

Synergies and Integration Between GRI and TCFD

Though distinct, GRI and TCFD can be highly complementary. Many companies integrate both frameworks to meet diverse stakeholder needs and comply with emerging regulations. GRI’s broad ESG focus pairs well with TCFD’s deep dive into financial impact.

As TCFD becomes embedded in the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and IFRS S2 (effective 2024), GRI reporters often reference TCFD metrics to satisfy investor requirements. This integration elevates reporting quality and ensures alignment with global best practices.

Real-World Applications and Regulatory Landscape

Regulatory momentum is accelerating. The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) mandates GRI-compatible disclosures. In the United States, the SEC’s Climate Rule leans heavily on TCFD architecture. Region-specific laws like California SB 253/SB 261 further tighten requirements.

Many countries now require or encourage IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures, which are inherently TCFD-aligned. As a result, companies reporting under GRI often embed IFRS S2 elements to satisfy multiple jurisdictions.

  • EU CSRD: Mandatory sustainability disclosures
    (with GRI alignment)
  • US SEC Climate Rule: Emphasis on TCFD-led financial risk reporting
  • IFRS S2: Global baseline for climate-related financial disclosures

Supporting Frameworks and Tools

Beyond GRI and TCFD, organizations leverage specialized frameworks and platforms to refine targets and data quality. Leading examples include:

  • SBTi (Science Based Targets initiative): Align emission reduction targets with climate science
  • CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project): Largest corporate climate data repository
  • ISSB/IFRS S2: Ensures global consistency in climate disclosures

Challenges and the Path Forward

Despite progress, obstacles remain. Companies struggle with data granularity, assurance, and resource constraints—especially smaller enterprises. Aligning GRI’s qualitative insights with TCFD’s quantitative rigor demands robust data governance.

Technology is a critical enabler. Digital platforms, AI-driven analytics, and automated data collection strengthen comparability and verifiability. Investing in these tools not only streamlines reporting but also enhances strategic decision-making.

Ultimately, a genuine commitment to transparency fosters trust and drives innovation. By mastering both GRI and TCFD, organizations can:

  • Mitigate climate risks through informed strategy
  • Engage investors with credible, forward-looking data
  • Support a just transition for communities impacted by climate policies

Conclusion: Embracing a Sustainable Disclosure Future

Tracking corporate climate reporting is more than a compliance exercise—it is an opportunity to lead with integrity. By embracing GRI’s holistic perspective and TCFD’s financial focus, companies can tell a compelling story of resilience and purpose.

As stakeholders demand ever greater transparency, organizations that invest in robust reporting practices will stand out. They will earn trust, unlock capital, and contribute meaningfully to the global fight against climate change. The path forward is clear: integrate, innovate, and inspire.

Robert Ruan

About the Author: Robert Ruan

Robert Ruan